Higher-order control systems that plan, organize, make decisions, and inhibit impulses.
This is the mind’s conductor — the system that plans, prioritizes, organizes, and restrains impulses.
Life feels chaotic. You may act on impulse, mismanage time, or struggle to start or finish tasks.
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (planning, working memory), orbitofrontal cortex (inhibition, emotion), anterior cingulate (error monitoring), basal ganglia.
Dopamine and serotonin balance flexibility and impulse control, norepinephrine.
Trouble organizing daily tasks, managing finances, or regulating emotions.
7. Friedman & Robbins, Neuropsychopharmacology 47:72–89 (2022).
8. Dalley et al., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368:20120404 (2013).
Disorganized thought, poor planning, impulsivity, difficulty shifting between tasks, social disinhibition.
Identification Section
Name: ___________________________
Age: _______
Gender: ☐ Male ☐ Female ☐ Other
Date: ___________________________
Completed by: ☐ Parent ☐ Teacher ☐ Clinician ☐ Self
Purpose:
To assess areas of strength and difficulty in executive functioning—mental processes that enable planning, organization, self-monitoring, flexibility, attention, and emotional regulation.
Rating scale (optional):
0 = Never 1 = Sometimes 2 = Often 3 = Very often
(Alternatively, responses may be discussed qualitatively)
Optional Notes:
Examples of difficulties (e.g., incomplete homework, messy desk, forgotten items).
Optional Notes:
Examples of real-life situations or compensatory strategies used.
Optional Notes:
Describe how impulsivity affects performance or relationships.
Optional Notes:
Give examples of rigidity or adaptability in daily life.
Optional Notes:
Describe triggers, coping strategies, or supports that help.
Optional Notes:
Identify typical settings (school, home, work) where initiation is hardest.
Optional Notes:
Examples of insight, self-correction, or lack of awareness.
Optional Notes:
Describe strategies (alarms, planners, visual schedules) used.
Optional Notes:
Include examples of perseverance or avoidance patterns.
Name: ____________________ Age: _______ Date: __________
Assessor: ___________________________ Context: □ Clinical □ Educational □ Other __________
Rating Scale (for each item):
0 = Never 1 = Sometimes 2 = Often 3 = Very Often
Domain | Item Count | Raw Score | Average (Score ÷ Item Count) | Interpretation |
A. Planning & Organization | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
B. Working Memory | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
C. Inhibition & Self-Control | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
D. Cognitive Flexibility | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
E. Emotional Regulation | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
F. Initiation & Task Completion | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
G. Self-Monitoring & Awareness | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
H. Time Management | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
I. Goal-Directed Persistence | 5 | ____ | ____ | ☐ Normal ☐ Mild ☐ Moderate ☐ Severe |
Average Score (0–3) | Level of Difficulty | Interpretation and Suggested Action |
0.0–0.5 | Normal Range | Executive skills in this domain appear age-appropriate. Continue with current supports. |
0.6–1.2 | Mild Difficulty | Occasional lapses. Monitor, encourage strategy use, or classroom accommodations. |
1.3–2.0 | Moderate Difficulty | Persistent problems interfering with learning or self-management. Recommend structured interventions or cognitive-behavioural strategies. |
2.1–3.0 | Severe Difficulty | Marked impairment. May require individualized education plan (IEP), therapeutic input, or neuropsychological evaluation. |
Strengths Identified:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Areas of Concern:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Observed Triggers or Contexts:
(e.g., transitions, unstructured time, group settings)
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Compensatory Strategies or Supports in Place:
(e.g., visual schedules, verbal cues, breaks, planners, timers)
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The assessment of executive function skills indicates that [Name] demonstrates relative strengths in [strong domains] and difficulties in [weak domains].
Areas of concern include [describe behaviour patterns such as poor planning, impulsivity, or emotional reactivity], which appear to affect [school performance / daily living / relationships].
These findings suggest that targeted interventions (e.g., explicit strategy teaching, structured routines, visual organization aids, self-monitoring checklists) may enhance performance in the identified domains.
Follow-up with [psychologist / occupational therapist / educator / clinician] is recommended if executive function difficulties persist or impact daily functioning significantly.
While quantitative scoring aids comparison, qualitative context is crucial. Executive functions are context-dependent and develop with age, environment, and motivation. Patterns across domains—rather than absolute numbers—often yield the most insight.